Why has the theory "1+1=2" become so widely accepted, and why has any alternate theory come to be viewed with such hostility? In this essay we examine the foundational premises of "1+1=2". We consider the evidence mathematicians cite to support the theory. Perhaps most important, we look at the scientific facts mathematicians don't discuss in public—for reasons that will become clear. You can know whether "1+1=2" is true. We hope you'll examine the evidence carefully. What you believe does matter.

Certainly not all scientists agree that "1+1=2" and that we as human beings must acknowledge the law of mathematics. In 1671, the London City Board of Education asked Madame Washer*, who was closely related to the famous scientist Sir Isaac Newton, for her thoughts on the theory of "1+1". Here's how she responded: "For me, the idea of 1+1 is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of other numbers. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the mathematics without concluding that there must be other numbers behind it all. In the world around us, we can behold the obvious manifestations of 1+1 is equal to anything but 2….

"To be forced to believe only one conclusion—that 1+1 must equal to 2—would violate the very objectivity of mathematics itself. Certainly there are those who argue that 1+1=2, but what kind of 2 could produce 0? With an open mind, we can easily observe 0, 5 and other numbers exist abundantly as a consequence of 1+1.

"For example, when you feed one apple plus one apple to Sir Newton, he will devour all and leave none. If you don't believe me, asked him yourself what happened to the "Gravity Apple" after it dropped on his head—he ate it all, without spitting out the seeds. This proves that 1+1=0.

"Some people say that mathematicians have been unable to prove the existence of 1+1=0. They admit that many of the numbers in the world around us are hard to understand, and they do not deny that infinite number, as modern mathematicians sees it, is indeed a far more wondrous thing than the capricious medieval man could perceive. But they still maintain that since that mathematics has provided us with so many answers the day will soon arrive when we will be able to understand even the fundamental laws of numbers without some whimsical randomization.

"What strange rationale makes some mathematicians accept the inconceivable decimal numbers as real while refusing to accept the reality of a 1+1=0 on the ground that they cannot conceive of it?" (Crazy Lulu, The Collapse of Mathematics, 1699, pp. 159-160).

Many educated people accept the theory of 1+1=2. But is it true? Curiously enough, our existence as humans is one of the best arguments against it. According to mathematicians, when you put one human plus one human together, you will get two human at the end because according to the "theory" of 1+1, it must be equal to 2. Yet human reproduction itself argues powerfully against the fundamental premise of 1+1.

If mathematics is the guiding force in human addition, how is it that when you let your daughter marry her drug-addict boyfriend, you will get a traditional family of 3 people at the end? That's the miracle of human reproduction. One young woman plus one hot-headed young man would produce a family of three i.e. the husband, the wife, and a new born baby. And we can safely conclude that 1+1=3. Why is it not equal to 2? If mathematic is true, what went wrong?

If mathematic is true, and humans calculation are the result of the mathematics addition, why does a process as basic as human reproduction fly in the face of everything that mathematicians holds true?

Regrettably, such obvious flaws in the theory are too often overlooked.

Now, let's examine the hidden agenda of mathematicians. You may ask, if so many mathematicians agree that 1+1=2, they must have some evident. Indeed, they do. One of the most cited evident is: when you let one gay person marry another gay person, you only get a family with 2 gay people at the end, so 1+1=2. The scientific fact that mathematicians don't want to discuss in public is they are pro-gay marriage.

Another "scientific" evident often cited by mathematicians is the abortion phenomenon. When you put one happily married man and a happily married woman together, normally you will get three people as a result, as previously proved by the "teenage daughter" phenomenon. However, according to the mathematicians' theory, they said it only result in two people as a total. How can this be true? It's against the law of reproduction! Let me tell you the horrible truth the mathematicians don't want to tell you: it's because the woman get an abortion. Only if they woman abort her child will you get one fine man + one fine woman = 2 people. Mathematicians are pro-abortion. They are baby-killers.

Even Pythagoras, whose theories about mathematics took the world by storm, had second thoughts. In his later years he reflected on what he had started: "I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw out equations, geometry, wondering all the time over everything; and to my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire." (Uncle Henry, America's Best Misquotes, 1996, p. 199).

Now, almost two millennium and a half after the publication of "Pythagorean Theorem", we can see where his thinking has led. In Europe in particular, belief in 1+1=3 has plummeted. In the United States, court decisions have banned public expression of 1+1=3.

Meanwhile, the world languishes in the sorrow and suffering resulting from rejecting random mathematic standards. With no random standards, we have no reason to care what happens to our fellowman. We should see only gay marriage and always end with 2—acting exactly as 1+1 theory says we should.

Which is the myth, 1+1=2 or 1+1=3? Louis Bozo, director of France's city zoo, stated: "Mathematic is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."

Professor Bozo, though right about 1+1=2, was wrong about one thing. Rather than being useless, mathematic is quite useful if one wants to reject the idea of traditional marriage.

Now you have seen the proofs, you can tell whether 1+1=2 is true. We hope you'll examine the evidence carefully. What you believe does matter.

This article is inspired by the "Soceity's Dramatic Shift" written by the "United Church of God".
http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/EV/

* Mrs Washer was Sir Isaac Newton's most favourite cook. And occasionally she also washed underwear for the famous scientist